Private Eye logo
twitter
twitter
rss
shop
advertise
home
LOCKERBIE LATEST
 
Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi
The break-in at Heathrow
It was supposedly a Scottish prosecution, but two US prosecutors sat alongside the prosecution team and appeared to Dr Kochler to be “supervisors” influencing what was released into open court and what was kept secret. Said Dr Kochler: "It was a consistent pattern during the whole trial. As an apparent result of political interest considerations, efforts were undertaken to withhold substantial information from the court.”

More evidence has since emerged – such as a break-in at Heathrow near the Pan Am bay shortly before the flight took off, which was concealed from the trial. This might have explained evidence that was given at the trial by a baggage handler who said he saw that an extra Samsonite briefcase (like the one experts said contained the bomb) had been placed on top of a baggage container destined for the flight while he had left it unattended when he went for his tea.

Governments are still influencing the case
Further evidence, which the Scottish criminal cases review commission (SCCRC) has seen, and which formed one of the six grounds that it cited pointing to the fact that the wrong man had been convicted, remains secret. Even now, 20 years down the line, the government is still claiming public interest immunity on evidence that the SCCRC said should never have been withheld.

With Megrahi’s agreement to drop his appeal and his resulting release, it is clear that governments are still influencing the case. If Britain’s new best friend, Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi, and his government have been welcoming Megrahi back in a way that seems to have offended so many commentators, it is because they owe him. He was a step in their country’s rehabilitation with the west.

As the Eye has said ever since we predicted that the appeal would not be heard, it suits none of the administrations – the US, the UK or Libya – to have the case reopened. The forthcoming release of the papers by Tony Kelly, Megrahi’s Glasgow-based solicitor, should prove that the Libyan was not responsible for the atrocity in the skies over Lockerbie. The papers will not prove, however, who was responsible, nor why the chance to bring the real bombers to justice was so evidently botched – or, worse, deliberately sabotaged. That is what the politicians should really be shouting about.

OTHER TOP STORIES IN THE LATEST ISSUE:

- AUTISM CARE
More cases of families being excluded from decisions about their children’s care as Stephen Neary is still not allowed home

- YUNUS BAKHSH
NHS Trust and union do their best to spin the tribunal victory of sacked and expelled activist

- IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTRES
G4S “disappointed” as Oakington centre closes – but at least they’ve got another three-year contract with five police forces to fall back on

- OLYMPIC GAMES
That 2012 legacy for Basildon – the loss of several playing fields?

- HEALTH CHECK
Ambulances in South London outsourced to company run by a man responsible for four businesses that were wound up owing tax

- HIGH PRINCIPALS
Salford University council amends rules so that members can receive ‘benefits’ as it decides against publishing expense information after all

- LEGAL AID
Vulnerable children face double whammy which will force out nearly half of firms specialising in family court work

For all these stories and much, much, more, buy the latest edition of Private Eye, available now from all good newsagents.

Issue No: 1269
Date: 20th August 2010
Price: £1.50

Alternatively you can subscribe and get the magazine delivered to your home every fortnight at a cheaper rate, by clicking here »

Next issue in the shops: 31st August
 
 
About  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Links  |  Mailout
Private Eye, 6 Carlisle Street, London, W1D 3BN
© Private Eye 2010