Private Eye logo
rss
twitter
twitter
rss
14th
Dec
McHackey strikes again
Posted by Adam Macqueen | 3 comments »

Here’s what the Ephraim Hardcastle column in today’s Daily Mail had to say about my appearance at the Oldie Literary Lunch to talk about the book:

Private Eye founder Richard Ingrams, 74, ridicules the £25 book launched to mark the magazine’s 50th anniversary this year, calling it a ‘scrapbook’ full of mistakes rather than a history.

He made his remarks – which will anger Ian Hislop, 51, the Eye editor – while introducing the book’s author, Adam Macqueen, at an Oldie literary luncheon yesterday.

Poor Macqueen looked mortified. Ingrams also claims that Macqueen was instructed not to discuss Private Eye’s finances in his book.

And here’s what I had to say in an email to the column’s editor, former Eye hack Peter McKay, this morning.

Hello Peter,

That really was the biggest load of old bollocks in your column this morning about my appearance at yesterday’s Oldie literary lunch. Richard didn’t say a word about mistakes in his introduction, and I’m hardly likely to take offence at him describing it as a scrapbook when that was exactly how I described the effect I wanted to the book’s designer while we were putting it together. Far from being mortified, I thought his introduction was very funny, and we had a very warm and friendly conversation afterwards (and another one this morning about your piece, as it happens!)

More seriously, I didn’t have any instructions from anyone as to what was discussed in the book, financial or otherwise, and I wouldn’t have accepted the commission if any conditions like that had been put on it. Perhaps you’re getting muddled with your own position – I remember when I interviewed you for the book you talked very entertainingly about the Mail’s own failure to cover Private Eye’s revelations about Lord Rothermere’s tax arrangements.

Still, I suppose I should say thanks for plugging the book…

Yours aye

Adam

The book (complete with lots of interesting material about Peter McHackey in the days before he got sacked) is, incidentally, on sale for a limited period on Waterstones.com for just £15


3 Comments »

  1. Comment by Paul T Horgan
    December 14, 2011 @ 11:38 am

    You fail to mention in your article that Peter Mackay expected to replace Ingrams in 1986 and that his anger at being usurped by the relatively young Ian Hislop has been the source of a resentment to rival Edward Heath after losing to Thatcher a decade previously.



  2. Comment by Ken Jennings
    December 15, 2011 @ 9:04 am

    A shameless plug for your own book? Playing the controversy card? Surely not. I think we should be told.
    Happy birthday Eye.



  3. Comment by David Farmbrough
    December 31, 2011 @ 6:35 pm

    It’s interesting to imagine what would have happened had Peter been able to take over the Eye when Ingrams retired. It would probably have become a huge (and inaccurate) Street Of Shame.


Leave a comment

Latest Posts
You wait ages for a sequel, and then two come along at once»
*kills self*»
Amazon up swanee»
McHackey strikes again»
And what do points mean?»
Latest Comments
Andy: ¨well, being a careful chap, I still have my Private Eye Orgy mug, made in 1965 ...¨
Justin: ¨Adam I strongly agree with you (that there are a group of us who feel like th...¨
Rogert: ¨I first saw the Eye back in the early 60's when I was still at school and a fell...¨
Archives
September 2013 »
December 2011 »
November 2011 »
October 2011 »
September 2011 »
August 2011 »
May 2011 »
March 2011 »
January 2011 »
February 2010 »
October 2009 »
September 2009 »
July 2009 »
June 2009 »
May 2009 »
April 2009 »
March 2009 »
February 2009 »
About  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Links  |  Mailout
Private Eye, 6 Carlisle Street, London, W1D 3BN
© Private Eye 2014
rss
twitter
twitter
rss