Private Eye logo
rss
twitter
twitter
rss
2nd
Mar
“The most sued man in Britain”
Posted by Adam Macqueen | 2 comments »

651_big

A side-note to Julian Assange’s rather bizarre defence of his phone-call to Ian Hislop detailed in the edition of Private Eye out this week (£1.50 in all good newsagents right now!).

Rather than correct a smear, Mr. Hislop has attempted, perhaps not surprisingly, to justify one smear with another in the same direction. That he has a reputation for this, and is famed to have received more libel suits in the UK than any other journalist as a result, does not mean that it is right.

The Wikileaks leader’s valiant attempt to ally himself with such victims of calumny as James Goldsmith, Robert Maxwell, Sonia Sutcliffe and John Condliffe involves a big dose of balls. In the three years I have spent working on the history of Private Eye I’ve never found anything to substantiate the “Ian Hislop is the most sued man in Britain” claim that’s been floating around the web and press cuttings for a good while now. I asked him about it in one of our interviews:

AM: There’s this fact floating around about you that you’re ‘the most sued man in history’…
IH: Says who?
AM: Says Wikipedia, I think.
IH: Yeah, yeah. Must be true!
AM: In terms of libel cases, would you say the Eye is below or above average?
IH: In terms of everyone else, or generally? Well, you know, libel collapsed completely. Members of the libel bar had to retrain! The great old days went. It was partly our fault, for whingeing about the need to change the law and then it got changed. Sutcliffe was the turnaround, it meant the court of appeal could cap libel damages, the judge was allowed to direct the jury as to amount, everything that had been mad about it started to be changed… It created a real sea change: there was a feeling that if you went to court you might lose. For most of the 80s, you just won, or you settled. So the actual number of libel actions went way down for us. And partly I feel because the journalism was more robust, and stouter. And we did a lot more telling people to fuck off at an early stage, and a lot more winning outside the court. I think at the moment we’re all worried about injunctions and privacy, the whole new game seems to be occupying vast amounts of time and money. And libel has become, touch wood, less of an issue.

Sheila Molnar, the Eye’s managing director, told me rather mournfully in January that she “can’t remember when we last had a writ.”

Still, it looks like that champion of the free flow of information Mr Assange is quite keen on bucking the general trend, judging by this tweet a month ago.

That wasn’t true, either. Wikileaks have taken no legal action whatsoever over the book.


Latest Posts
You wait ages for a sequel, and then two come along at once»
*kills self*»
Amazon up swanee»
McHackey strikes again»
And what do points mean?»
Latest Comments
Andy: ¨well, being a careful chap, I still have my Private Eye Orgy mug, made in 1965 ...¨
Justin: ¨Adam I strongly agree with you (that there are a group of us who feel like th...¨
Rogert: ¨I first saw the Eye back in the early 60's when I was still at school and a fell...¨
Archives
September 2013 »
December 2011 »
November 2011 »
October 2011 »
September 2011 »
August 2011 »
May 2011 »
March 2011 »
January 2011 »
February 2010 »
October 2009 »
September 2009 »
July 2009 »
June 2009 »
May 2009 »
April 2009 »
March 2009 »
February 2009 »
About  |  Contact  |  Privacy Policy  |  Links  |  Mailout
Private Eye, 6 Carlisle Street, London, W1D 3BN
© Private Eye 2014
rss
twitter
twitter
rss