hp sauce

Blue blood
Legal News , Issue 1621

hancock-bridgen.jpg IN "cases ideally both sides would lose" news, last month saw the libel battle between disgraced former Tory MPs Andrew Bridgen and Matt Hancock reach its first court stage.

The former handsy health secretary's legal team somehow managed to keep a straight face while presenting an extraordinary argument as to why the case should proceed no further.

Brought by demented anti-vaxxer, occasional party-pal of Laurence Fox and fallen potato potentate Bridgen, it concerns a tweet Hancock posted on the same day in January 2023 that Bridgen made a much-publicised comparison between Covid vaccines and the Holocaust.

Sick burn
Although Bridgen helpfully made it clear to the court he had no problem with other parliamentary colleagues calling him things like "'offensive', 'sick', 'irresponsible' [and] 'inappropriate'" because of his Holocaust comment, he objects to being called antisemitic, as he claims Hancock did in a tweet which read: "The disgusting and dangerous anti-semitic, anti-vax, anti-scientific conspiracy theories spouted by a sitting MP this morning are unacceptable and have absolutely no place in our society."

This message was posted less than two hours after the Conservative party had announced that Bridgen was having the whip suspended for having "caused great offence"; half an hour after prime minister Rishi Sunak had condemned such views and "the scourge of antisemitism" in response to a question at PMQs; and alongside a video of the latter exchange.

Reference point
Nevertheless, Hancock tried to have the case struck out on grounds that Bridgen had failed to "plead a viable case on reference". Last month his KC, Aidan Eardley, attempted to convince the Honourable Mrs Justice Steyn that reasonable readers would not necessarily have understood the message he posted about Bridgen as being about Bridgen.

"The defendant's tweet refers to a 'sitting MP'. There are 650 MPs," the judgment notes. "Mr Eardley submits that even if (generously) some degree of knowledge of the claimant's political activities and interests were ascribed to the reader, it would still be unreasonable for such a reader to jump to the conclusion again, without knowledge of other facts that, of all possible MPs, the defendant's tweet was about the claimant."

The hypothetical reader, lest we forget, is someone sufficiently interested in politics to read the Twitter account of a former cabinet minister.

But Eardley also suggested "it is fanciful" to suppose that Bridgen's "new status as a person from whom the whip had been withdrawn was an attribute" any such person would have known about him on the day it was headline news.

Persistent Steyn
The judge, by contrast, ruled that it is "highly likely the claimant would have little difficulty establishing reference innuendo", although she criticised Bridgen's particulars of claim as badly drafted and gave him a chance to go away and write them better (his legal bills are being generously covered by a loan from investment tycoon and culture warrior Jeremy Hosking, who also bankrolls Fox's Reclaim party, which is helpful since Steyn also ordered Bridgen to stump up £44,300 towards Hancock's costs).

The Eye suggests another solution that would definitely add to the gaiety of the nation: all 648 other sitting MPs should sue Hancock for defamation too, and force him to prove it wasn't any of them he was referring to.

To read all these stories in full, please buy issue 1621 of Private Eye - you can subscribe here and have the magazine delivered to your home every fortnight.

Next issue on sale: 24th April 2024

More top stories in the latest issue:

When Grant Shapps was quizzed about his departmental spending by the defence select committee, it escalated into quite a shoot-out.

The latest swing of the revolving door between the military and the arms industry suggests our procurement system is unlikely to improve any time soon.

A Lords private members' bill seeks to improve monitoring of the government's response to genocides. But the government doesn't seem sure what genocide is.

Shared ownership has become the dominant form of "affordable home ownership", but partial owners are being hit by disproportionately high costs.

EU leaders are having to face the thorny question of what to do with Russian assets that have been frozen since Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine.

The government about to stymie the deal under which the seamless transfer of data between the UK and EU – crucial to trade – can continue to happen.

Buried in the Football Governance Bill are potentially harsh measures for club owners if they obstruct or mislead investigations by the proposed new regulator.

The GMB's general secretary is facing calls to quit as the union drags its heels in implementing the recommendations in Karon Monaghan KC's report.

Red flags
Red flags
More trouble for Labour
News, Issue 1621
Just the ticket!
Just the ticket!
Keir Starmer's appetite for freebies
News, Issue 1620
Hot dogs
Hot dogs
Puppy farms continue to prosper
In The Back, Issue 1620
Private Eye Issue 1621
In This Issue
Top Tory in ‘moneytrap' sting… Humza Plotter and the Half Baked Crime Bill… MP in second home shock… Nurseryland honeytrap sting warning… Benjamin Netanyahu's guide to surgeons attempting to remove his hernia… Britain ‘prepared to do nothing'… Are there enough senior royal reporters to go round?… A new short story by Clara Sill, Britain's top romantasy novelist… A Very Royal Scoop Scandal, the untold story… Vital issues of our day (1): the Garrick Club, as told to Craig Brown.

Russia Watch
The fallout from last month's Moscow terror attack

Where's Boris?
GB News is missing its star signing

The latest flag tweak to attract tabloid fury

Read these stories and much more - only in the magazine. Subscribe here to get delivery direct to your home and never miss an issue!
ONLY £2.99
24th April 2024
Private Eye Issue 1620