in the back

Windfall Drax
Tree burning , Issue 1635
drax.jpg Old Sparky writes… IF tree-burning power station Drax is to continue generating after 2027 when its vast subsidies run out, it wants even more billions in bungs for its future biomass schemes.

Even though the scientific evidence suggests its plans do nothing for decarbonisation but prolong the false "carbon accounting" on which Drax depends (Eyes passim), civil servants have drawn up contracts to give it the new types of bungs it demands.

Everything hinges on energy secretary Ed Miliband's decision, due this month. Miliband is a tree-burning sceptic, even though persisting with Drax's "zero carbon" fallacy is vital to his claim, purely on paper, that decarbonisation is feasible by his fanciful 2030 target (Eye 1630).

But chancellor Rachel Reeves, whose constituency isn't far from Drax and who wants growth and investment at any price, has told him he's to give Drax whatever it asks for. It'll fall on electricity bills, not her budget.

Preparing to fail?
Having brazened out a recent £25m Ofgem fine for poor record-keeping and an adverse report from the National Audit Office (Eyes 1616 and 1632), Drax might now seem to be on the brink of triumph. But insiders report that company executives fear the whole game might come down and are even preparing the lifeboats. There's plenty for them to worry about.

Top of the list are the many Drax staff fed up with supporting the deceptions on which Drax's claim on a "renewables" subsidy is based – the trickery that allows Drax to claim it emits no net CO2. This is intrinsic to its business model but has a corrosive effect on many staff, whose increasing attempts to blow the whistle internally are being ignored.

Chris Rawlinson, regional union organiser for Unite, was escorted off the premises with the threat of dire consequences if he pursues whistleblower cases. The unions, like Reeves, are mainly concerned for the jobs Drax represents.

Skeletons in closets
In particular, some former civil servants whom Drax hired to help with policy work soon found themselves at odds with the company when they realised what they had signed up for; one who was let go is pursuing legal action. Two embarrassing issues could emerge when their lawyers demand document disclosure.

Last week the Financial Times mentioned anonymous internal Drax emails making it clear the company knew it had screwed up. The Eye has been told they were from Claire Sedgwick, a senior Drax lawyer involved in certifying its biomass sources. She was investigating whether Drax had grounds to sue the BBC for its 2022 Panorama programme which revealed the unsustainability of some of Drax's sources of trees.

Drax didn't sue.

Secondly, insiders suggest that the fuel costs Drax claimed on tax returns relating to the energy profits levy on windfalls made during the energy crisis, could be open to challenge.

Drax produces much of its own fuel, in a market for wood pellets of limited price transparency (unlike the markets for gas and electricity): the scope for HM Revenue & Customs to query its cost reporting is considerable. Drax, of course, has already been fined by Ofgem for shoddy fuel reporting.

Duty of candour
Government decision-making on Drax's demands for more subsidies leaves it open to judicial review. Drax has benefited from partisan support in Whitehall, even though last week the Tories belatedly came out against future bungs for tree-burning.

The "duty of candour" governing judicial reviews will force ministers, civil servants and Ofgem to acknowledge what they know about the very strong case against tree-burning producing zero carbon, which Whitehall blithely ignores, and Drax's efforts to obscure the facts.

Will to survive
Litigation arising from whatever cause would likely see thin-skinned chief executive Will Gardiner called to the stand. Drax staff say Gardiner "wets himself" whenever he is called before even a select committee: a court appearance would be torture.

To avoid any of the above potential disasters, Gardiner (who has dual US-UK citizenship) and other senior Drax suits have set up Elimini, a "lifeboat" company which could take Drax know-how – including the carbon accounting tricks – to exploit tree-burning opportunities in the US and elsewhere.

Law firm Mishcon de Reya is circling the leaking ship, assessing whether Gardiner et al could also be sued for misleading Drax shareholders. The US might be a more comfortable place to be when any of this hits the turbine blades.

Time surely for Miliband to give his decision on prolonging the Drax farce.

More top stories in the latest issue:

PALACE INTRIGUE
Newly unearthed papers contradict claims from the Spencer-Churchill family that their solar farm scheme will not impair the heritage value of the estate.

FLAT BATTERIES
Broadband firms need better battery back-ups before the switch-off of the copper wire network, which allows 999 calls during a power cut.

FISH FIGHT
Claims and counter-claims of aggression and underhand tactics marred a Scottish parliamentary inquiry into the future of Scottish salmon farming.

MATES' RATES?
More juicy contracts for the well-connected at the Teesside freeport, chaired by regional mayor Lord (Ben) Houchen.

OLD SOAKED
Frail nursing home residents are being turfed out to make way for healthy, wealthy older folk at a luxurious Oxfordshire housing estate for over-55s.

BULLY BEEF
A large number of Post Office staff potentially implicated in the Horizon IT scandal still work in the unit sorting out compensation for sub-postmasters.

MANSPLAINING
Ineos billionaire Jim Ratcliffe has ambitious plans for Manchester United – but his employee relations history might make fans and government think twice.

BONFIRE OF INANITY
Keir Starmer has pledged to "rip out the bureaucracy that blocks investment". Governments have tried deregulation before, with calamitous consequences.

CLASS WARFARE
A supercollege formed from the merger of seven further education institutions has been given a financial notice and told to improve by education funders.

GROWING PAIN
Private allotments company Roots has finally put in a retrospective application for planning permission at a 25-acre site it has been developing in Bristol.

To read all these stories in full, please buy issue 1635 of Private Eye - you can subscribe here and have the magazine delivered to your home every fortnight.

Next issue on sale: 20th November 2024
gnitty
MORE TOP STORIES ONLINE
Costa packet
Costa packet
The MP who oversees standards
HP Sauce, Issue 1634
War of words
War of words
Lines are drawn in SLAPP wars
Street Of Shame, Issue 1635
Covering Drax
Covering Drax
Troubled times at the energy firm
In The Back, Issue 1635
ALSO IN THIS ISSUE
ONLY IN THE MAGAZINE
Private Eye Issue 1635
In This Issue
Macbeth defends wife over hurtful comparison… JK Rowling in peerage controversy… Wealthy people unhappy about any proposals in budget which will make them less wealthy… Lines on the passing of Alex Salmond, former First Minister of Scotland… Update: another head of Hydra cut off… Doctor Foster to deal with obesity crisis… Conspiracy update: Russell Brand amulet special… Exclusive to all tabloids: we say 'Willkommen' to England's new German manager… Melania Trump's Diary, as told to Craig Brown

Sun protection
How the Spencer-Churchills became fans of solar energy

Moonlighting
The MPs raking in cash from second jobs

Harris hawks
Nervous times in the Democratic party campaign

Read these stories and much more - only in the magazine. Subscribe here to get delivery direct to your home and never miss an issue!
ONLY £2.99
SUBSCRIBE HERE
NEXT ISSUE ON SALE
20th November 2024
WHY SUBSCRIBE?
Private Eye Issue 1634
MORE FROM PRIVATE EYE