in the back
Very dear diary
The Mountbattens , Issue 1573
SECRET DIARY: Louis and Edwina Mountbatten, some of whose diary entries from 1947 are still too incendiary to release apparently as they are rude about Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Pakistan's first governor-general
HISTORIAN Andrew Lownie has achieved a victory – albeit a Pyrrhic one, since it has used up his £350,000 life savings – in his struggle to prise open the archives of Lord and Lady Mountbatten, housed at Southampton University.

Five years after the university refused to let him see the Mountbattens' diaries and correspondence, saying they had been "closed" by the Cabinet Office, it has now released more than 99 percent of them, running to 35,000 pages.

Before being bought for the nation in 2011, they had already been studied by authors and researchers. According to Philip Ziegler, who quoted extensively from the letters and journals in his biography Mountbatten (1985), "they contain no great secrets".

Soon after the 2011 purchase, however, university archivist Professor Chris Woolgar secretly asked Whitehall to order their closure. As revealed in Eye 1548, he wrote to the Cabinet Office: "I don't believe these should be available to researchers… given their many references to the royal family." There were "other elements" that worried him: "Lady M's diaries for 1947-48, and possibly into the 1950s, have references to India and Pakistan." Hardly surprising given that Mountbatten was the last viceroy of India. When the sale of the papers was first reported this same Prof Woolgar told the BBC that "without them we would find it difficult to understand fully the foundations of the independent states of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh". Yet in private he was telling the Cabinet Office: "I believe we should use the exemptions under FoI [Freedom of Information] to close them."

Secrecy fetishists
In 2019 the Information Commissioner ordered the archive to show Lownie the papers. Spurred on by the Cabinet Office's secrecy fetishists, Southampton refused to obey and appealed to the information tribunal. After getting short shrift from a judge at a preliminary hearing in February 2021, the university and Cabinet Office nevertheless persisted with their challenge, which was to have a full hearing last November. But with defeat looming, a reverse ferret was needed. Even while briefing expensive QCs to argue that it shouldn't release the Mountbatten files, Southampton quietly did just that. Last summer, with no announcement, it posted online digitised copies of almost the entire archive (Eye 1554).

Six-figure legal bills
These confirmed Ziegler's judgement: no sensational secrets, merely a fascinating historical resource. So why had Whitehall and Southampton run up six-figure legal bills – at taxpayers' expense – to block access? While claiming the credit for their belated openness, they implied that even the few remaining redactions were enough to justify the time and money devoted to obstructing Lownie.

With 35,000 pages now suddenly public, the November hearing was mostly reduced to the minutiae of royal exemptions from FoI. The tribunal's judgment, not yet published but seen by the Eye, concludes that Southampton University's appeal and Lownie's counter-appeal "are both allowed in part" – though its even-handed logic is sometimes hard to follow.

Because it "contains personal information about the Queen", the university had censored a 1974 diary entry in which Brenda, "glittering with her tiara", embarked from the royal yacht in Auckland for an official dinner. The tribunal thinks this shouldn't be censored – but then endorses redaction for the same reason ("personal information about the Queen") of a 1971 diary entry in which Lord Mountbatten has scrambled eggs with Brenda and Princess Anne before watching The Tales of Beatrix Potter.

Secret evidence
More seriously, some parts of the diaries for 1947 will remain secret for reasons of high diplomacy. In secret evidence to the tribunal, Foreign Office mandarin Nigel Casey warned that relations with Pakistan could be harmed by releasing 75-year-old journals in which, for instance, the viceroy's wife is rude about former governor-general Muhammad Ali Jinnah.

Lownie's lawyers pointed out that Edwina Mountbatten's entries about the "megalomaniac and pathological" Jinnah are already quoted in Janet Morgan's official biography Edwina Mountbatten (1991), Pamela Mountbatten's India Remembered (2007) and elsewhere. But Casey insisted they must be suppressed lest Pakistan – where freedom of information laws are "not well understood" – interprets their release as signalling "the perceived approval of the British government".

The tribunal's judgment defers entirely to the "expertise and experience" of the FO man. But not everyone finds him such a credible witness: in evidence to the Commons foreign affairs committee in March, Whitehall whistleblower Josie Stewart said Casey had "intentionally lied to the committee" about the evacuation of Pen Farthing's dogs from Afghanistan.

Lownie says he won't appeal the decision, having reached the end of the financial road – especially since the information tribunal doesn't normally award costs. With legal bills outstanding, he is appealing for funds via the CrowdJustice site. But he still feels it was worth using FoI to unlock an important historical archive "which would otherwise have languished undiscovered and degrading in the university's library".

More top stories in the latest issue:

Fresh documents show that the legal pursuit of the Conservative Middle East Council's Charlotte Leslie also involves surveillance by private snoops.

Sistema, owned by sanctioned oligarch Vladimir Yevtushenkov, has now lost four key directors but is trying to keep the boardroom exodus under wraps.

A National Portrait Gallery prize continues under the sponsorship of one of London's most aggressive law firms, a keen proponent of SLAPP legal actions.

A defence minister refused to confirm or deny the return of US nuclear bombs to Suffolk, after a document revealed plans to upgrade old storage facilities.

A trial at Southwark crown court could pose some serious questions over the Ministry of Defence's role in decades of arms deals.

An environmental report reveals that wild swimmers in Scotland are sharing their open waters with harmful chemicals discharged by fish farms.

New mothers donating their umbilical cords to the Anthony Nolan charity may have been helping businesses profit from unproven "stem cell" injections.

A university insists no rules were broken by its principal, who did not declare his shares in a graphene company caught up in legal disputes in China.

A dangerous secure training centre is set to reopen as plans for "secure schools" for vulnerable young people in the justice system have yet to get off the ground.

Maximus, the US firm with a very shaky record of UK outsourcing work, has hired a key government insider to help it win new contracts.

To read all these stories in full, please buy issue 1573 of Private Eye - you can subscribe here and have the magazine delivered to your home every fortnight.

Next issue on sale: 25th May 2022
Private Eye Issue 1573
In This Issue
BP and Shell executives see grounds for optimism in Ukraine war as oil price goes through the roof… Britain to lead world again, says Sun, as Europe’s fattest nation by 2033… People traffickers hail Rwanda scheme a triumph as migrants rush to cross Channel before deportation deadline…No more medicines, powdered baby milk or travelling on the M20 to Dover – those Brexit Bonanza Bills in full… Jubilation across the media as TalkTV’s tumbling ratings become must-see event… Motorists face yet more gridlock as Highways Agency tactics outperform Extinction Rebellion and Insulate Britain… EU still struggling to switch energy supplier as US, Norway and Gulf states charge even more than Russia… Allison Pearson’s Diary, as told to Craig Brown

Wag trade
Rooney and Vardy in the box

SLAPP in the face
Lawyers versus freedom speech

Cord values
An Eye special on dodgy stem cell treatments

Read these stories and much more - only in the magazine. Subscribe here to get delivery direct to your home and never miss an issue!
ONLY £2.50
25th May 2022
Private Eye Issue 1572